The Australian-exclusive exhibition ‘European Masterpieces from The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York’ is the second occasion on which Art Exhibitions Australia (AEA), The Metropolitan Museum of Art (The Met), and Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art (QAGOMA) have come together to present an exhibition, following ‘American Impressionism and Realism’ in 2009. It is QAGOMA’s third collaboration with The Met, which also loaned ‘20th Century Masters from The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York’ in 1986.

Spanning 500 years, ‘European Masterpieces’ is a breathtaking journey from the emerging Renaissance of the 1420s to the height of early twentieth century Post-Impressionism, including paintings by Fra Angelico, Titian, Raphael, Rembrandt, Turner, van Gogh and Monet. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to experience works which rarely leave permanent display in New York as part of one of the finest collections of European painting in the world,

With portraiture, still-life, landscape and figure studies, ‘European Masterpieces’ is essential for art-lovers of all ages and anyone with an interest in history, society, beauty, religious iconography, mythology and symbolism.

The following excerpt from the Introduction to the exhibition publication by Katharine Baetjer, Curator Emerita, European Paintings, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, looks at the history of The Met, both as a collecting institution and as a landmark building on New York’s 5th Avenue.

LIST OF WORKS: Discover all the artworks

DELVE DEEPER: More about the artists and exhibition

THE STUDIO: Artworks come to life

WATCH: The Met Curators highlight their favourite works

Beginnings

Americans in Paris on 4 July 1866 celebrated the 90th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence with a reception, speeches and dancing in the Bois de Boulogne. The Union’s victory over the Confederate States in the American Civil War was a recent memory, and in the north-eastern United States, industrialisation and growth were rampant. In a speech to those assembled, New York attorney John Jay noted that it was ‘time for the American people to lay the foundation of a National Institution and Gallery of Art’,[1] a suggestion taken up by a committee of the Union League Club of New York. In their October 1869 report, the committee drew attention to the city’s Central Park, which had just opened, and to the new Historical Society and the new Astor Library. Their proposals for an art museum were endorsed at a November meeting by some 300 individuals of standing who were present: all agreed that such a museum should be established and that, in the words of newspaper editor William Cullen Bryant, it should be ‘worthy of this great metropolis and of the wide empire of which New York is the commercial center’.[2] On 31 January 1870 the trustees and executive committee were voted into office, with railway man John Taylor Johnston as president, and philanthropist William Tilden Blodgett as second-incommand. The Metropolitan Museum of Art was incorporated on 13 April 1870.

The trustees had neither a collection nor money, which had to be raised. In November 1871, the first object was offered to the Museum and accepted: a Roman sarcophagus presented by Abdo Debbas, American vice-consul at Tarsus. Mr Blodgett had settled in Paris before the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War on 19 July 1870, and in August he bought 57 European old master paintings; in September he acquired a second tranche, of 100 paintings; and in November, a final group of 17 paintings. Each of the first two groups was supposed to represent the holdings of an individual divesting due to financial difficulties arising from the war, and so Blodgett and the trustees believed. In fact, the 174 pictures had been assembled by the dealers at public sales, or from their unsold — because relatively undesirable — stock. Blodgett, who intended the works for the nascent New York museum, offered them at cost in March 1871. Payment was completed in December, funds having by then been raised by public subscription.

Anthony van Dyck, The Netherlands 1599–1641 / Saint Rosalie Interceding for the Plague-Stricken of Palermo 1624 / Oil on canvas / 99.7 x 73.7cm / Purchase, 1871 / 71.41 / Collection: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Anthony van Dyck, The Netherlands 1599–1641 / Saint Rosalie Interceding for the Plague-Stricken of Palermo 1624 / Oil on canvas / 99.7 x 73.7cm / Purchase, 1871 / 71.41 / Collection: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York / View full image

The new Metropolitan Museum of Art opened on 22 February 1872 in a townhouse on Fifth Avenue near St Patrick’s Cathedral (which was then under construction). What was there to see? Influenced by the city’s Dutch heritage, the trustees focused on northern European art, with works by Anthony van Dyck (above), David Teniers the Younger and Salomon van Ruysdael. France was represented by Jean-Baptiste Greuze, and Germany by Christian Wilhelm Ernst Dietrich. In the June 1872 Atlantic Monthly, Henry James offered an anonymous assessment. Although there was ‘no first-rate example of a first-rate genius’, he thought that the new collection would be ‘a source of profit to students debarred from European opportunities’.[3]

In December 1872, Johnston, Blodgett and financier Junius Spencer Morgan authorised the purchase of a huge assemblage of Cypriot antiquities offered by Luigi Palma di Cesnola. This individual had begun life in northern Italy as a military officer, emigrated to the United States and fought for the Union in the Civil War. In 1865, he secured an appointment as American consul in Cyprus. Widescale digging was the order of the day, and Cesnola excavated and exported 5756 pieces before the Ottoman authorities clamped down on his activities. Failing to sell this material to museums in London, Berlin or St Petersburg, Cesnola turned his sights to familiar shores. In 1873, he arrived in the port of New York with hundreds of packing crates. The paintings previously acquired were moved to the Douglas Mansion at 14th Street between Sixth and Seventh avenues, which was large enough to receive the antiquities as well, on a temporary basis. As only the seller knew what the cases contained, Cesnola was hired to unpack, identify and install selected vases, bronzes, terracottas and especially sculptures, including many large limestone pieces from the site of Golgoi.

The first museum building opened without benefit of staff other than security. Trustee and publisher George Putnam then became the volunteer superintendent, with the understanding that a paid clerk would be hired to assist him. The Douglas Mansion was the second temporary home from 1873 until 14 February 1879. When Cesnola returned from a second tour in Cyprus, he was named secretary, and on 15 May 1879 he became the first director, serving until 1904. He and the trustees undertook the move to the new Metropolitan Museum of Art building at Fifth Avenue and 82nd Street. At first, Cesnola was supported by temporary hires. A curator and a librarian were engaged in 1882, and an organisational plan for a managerial staff of 22 was developed for the future. After studying European precedents, another curator was appointed; the first was responsible for paintings (plus works on paper, photographs and textiles), and the second for sculpture (anything that was not flat). Cesnola’s tenure also witnessed the installation of turnstiles, telephones and electric lights in the Museum.

Buildings

Although park officials had wished to preserve the purity of the laboriously manipulated natural environment of Central Park, architects Calvert Vaux and Frederick Law Olmsted judged a site at 82nd Street and Fifth Avenue appropriate for a museum or gallery, because the plot, tightly circumscribed, was ‘too small for the formation of spacious pastoral grounds’.[4] Its use was designated in 1869, months before The Metropolitan Museum of Art was incorporated. Half a million US dollars was set aside for construction, with the result that both the building and the land upon which it stands belong to the City of New York. Architectural development was haphazard: within 15 years, the original High Victorian Gothic Revival structure (below) had been bracketed by two U-shaped Neoclassical additions of different design to form a square, with crossings and four interior courts. On the main floor were the antiquities, and upstairs the European paintings (the European old masters are still there, under new glass roofs affording controlled natural lighting) (below).

A stereograph of the original Metropolitan Museum of Art building, designed by Calvert Vaux and Jacob Wrey Mould, from the north-east, 1880 / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

A stereograph of the original Metropolitan Museum of Art building, designed by Calvert Vaux and Jacob Wrey Mould, from the north-east, 1880 / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York / View full image

Installation view of Claude Monet’s Water Lilies 1916–19 (far left), The Metropolitan Museum of Art / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Installation view of Claude Monet’s Water Lilies 1916–19 (far left), The Metropolitan Museum of Art / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York / View full image

Claude Monet, France 1840–1926 / Water Lilies 1916–19 / Oil on canvas / 130.2 x 200.7cm / Gift of Louise Reinhardt Smith 1983 / 1983.532 / Collection: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Claude Monet, France 1840–1926 / Water Lilies 1916–19 / Oil on canvas / 130.2 x 200.7cm / Gift of Louise Reinhardt Smith 1983 / 1983.532 / Collection: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York / View full image

Two major American architects then took charge in succession. Richard Morris Hunt designed the central block on Fifth Avenue, with the Great Hall (below) and a gallery and staircase behind joining it to the original building. These structures were completed in 1902, after his death. The next architect, selected by the third president of the Museum, J Pierpont Morgan, was Charles Follen McKim, principal of the famous New York firm of McKim, Mead and White, who designed the extensions to the north and south in a more restrained classical style. His ambition was to create interiors with light, space, ease of circulation and flexibility, and important parts of these wings (completed in 1922) still serve the Museum’s needs. Hunt and McKim’s 300-metre-long facade is what you see when you approach the building today (below).

The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Great Hall / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Great Hall / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York / View full image

The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s 300-metre-long facade from the north-west / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s 300-metre-long facade from the north-west / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York / View full image

The Metropolitan Museum of Art from the south-east, showing the glassy additions by Kevin Roche John Dinkeloo and Associates, 1993 / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

The Metropolitan Museum of Art from the south-east, showing the glassy additions by Kevin Roche John Dinkeloo and Associates, 1993 / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York / View full image

Various additional spaces — a library, rooms for European decorative arts, an auditorium and the American Wing — were built contemporaneously and later, with interruptions not only for two World Wars but also periods of economic decline. Thomas Hoving became director in 1966. He and board chairman C Douglas Dillon selected Kevin Roche John Dinkeloo and Associates to implement a master plan, building the various wings outwards in a rectangle, into the park behind the facade (above). Roche flanked the existing structures with glass‑roofed courtyards and glass-curtain walls, designing additions that as much as possible are absorbed into the landscape (opposite). These wings house the Egyptian Temple of Dendur, the collections of donors Nelson Rockefeller and Robert Lehman, and the holdings of modern and contemporary art. The program was completed under Philippe de Montebello in 1990, with money raised by him and his predecessor from private sources. The size of the building doubled to 185 806 square metres to accommodate more than 1.5 million objects. In 2018, The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s three buildings (including The Cloisters in Fort Tryon Park and the Breuer Building on Madison Avenue) received more than 7 million visitors.

Extract from European Masterpieces from The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. ‘Introduction’ by Katharine Baetjer, Curator Emerita, European Paintings, The Metropolitan Museum of Art.


‘European Masterpieces’ publication

The full-colour 240pp hardback publication European Masterpieces from The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York was available in two special cover editions — either Caravaggio’s The Musicians 1597 or Marie Denise Villers with Marie Joséphine Charlotte du Val d’Ognes 1801 (illustrated).

Discover 65 magnificent paintings spanning a remarkable 500 years of European art.

Discover 65 magnificent paintings spanning a remarkable 500 years of European art. / View full image

This Australian-exclusive exhibition was at the Gallery of Modern Art from 12 June until 17 October 2021 and organised by The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, in collaboration with the Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art and Art Exhibitions Australia.

Featured image: The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s 300-metre-long facade from the north-west / © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Endnotes

  1. ^ John Jay, letter to Museum director Luigi Palma di Cesnola, 30 August 1890, quoted in Winifred E Howe, A History of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1913, p.100.
  2. ^ William Cullen Bryant quoted in Howe, p.107.
  3. ^ Henry James quoted in Katharine Baetjer, ‘Buying pictures for New York: The founding purchase of 1871’, Metropolitan Museum Journal, vol.39, 2004, p.177.
  4. ^ Frederick Law Olmsted and Calvert Vaux, letter to Henry G Stebbins, February 1872, Appendix B, Letter 2: ‘Examination of the design of the Park and of recent changes therein’, Second Annual Report of the Board of Commissioners of the Department of Public Parks for the Year Ending May 1, 1872, William C Bryant and Co., New York, 1872, p.100.

Related Stories

  • Read

    The language of nature

    Vincent van Gogh (1853–90) and Claude Monet (1840–1926) did more than paint a natural setting, they both celebrated nature. van Gogh’s The Flowering Orchard 1888 was inspired by the provençal sunshine and flowering fields of Arles, where Monet’s lily pad-laden sensation Water Lilies 1916–19 was completed in his own garden at Giverny. LIST OF WORKS: Discover all the artworks DELVE DEEPER: More about the artists and exhibition THE STUDIO: Artworks come to life WATCH: The Met Curators highlight their favourite works Vincent van Gogh ‘The Flowering Orchard’ 1888 The arrival of spring in Arles, France in 1888 found Vincent van Gogh ‘in a fury of work’. As he wrote to his brother Theo, ‘The trees are in blossom and I would like to do a Provençal orchard of tremendous gaiety’. Over a period of one month, between late March and late April, the artist dedicated 14 canvases to the subject, working in a range of sizes, formats and styles. His inclusion of the scythe and rake makes this one of only two orchard paintings to hint at a human presence. Inspired by Japanese prints and Impressionism, The Flowering Orchard 1888 speaks to Van Gogh’s rapport with nature as he experimented with colour, light, brushstrokes, calligraphic line and composition. In this composition we see the tremulous brown arching lines of the branches of the fruit trees reaching upwards to the mellow sky. This contrasts with the urgent brushstrokes of greens, creams and reds in the grasses and leaves. Overall, Van Gogh has conveyed an emotional sense of vibrancy and lyrical rhythm. Van Gogh was totally at one with this orchard landscape, immersed in its glory of colour, sound, scent, texture and movement. Indeed, he advocated that it was the language of nature that painters should pay attention to, so they could become absorbed in the spiritual essence of nature itself. In an active artistic career of only 10 years, Van Gogh produced nearly 900 paintings. Claude Monet ‘Water Lilies’ 1916–19 Water Lilies painted between 1916 and 1919 is an almost abstract field of colour. Claude Monet captures the visual sensation of a water-lily pond with few pictorial cues to its scale or depth. The painting represents one moment within the pond’s endless flux, creating a pad-laden pond with dappled sunlight and reflections of sky and weeping willows. With no obvious horizon line, its dappled surface stretches on forever. Monet was the founder of the revolutionary Impressionist art movement and was dedicated to outdoor observation. At age 50, Monet moved to Giverny, north of Paris, as part of his extensive gardening plans, he built a large Japanese-style garden and pond with lilies in 1893 that ignited a 30-year obsession. From 1899 on, he repeatedly turned to the subject, attempting to capture every observation, impression, and reflection of the flowers and water. Early paintings depict a picturesque landscape framed by an arched bridge, with water-lily pads floating above crisp reflections. By the end of his life, he had painted them no less than 250 times. The pond was surrounded by willows and irises, and water lilies imported especially from Japan. Monet even employed a gardener to arrange the plants each day to suit his painting. Monet said ‘Apart from painting and gardening, I am good for nothing. My greatest masterpiece is my garden’. Monet’s works show us the temporary beauty of the moment, and he said: ‘For me, a landscape does not exist in its own right, since its appearance changes at every moment’. By the mid-1910s, Monet’s technique became more impressionistic, as he began to suffer from cataracts that impaired his perception of shapes and tone, his clouded vision led to innovative combinations of colour and looser, broader brushstrokes. The lilies are roughly outlined and he applied paint in short rapid brushstrokes using a flat, square paintbrush instead of the usual round brush. This Australian-exclusive exhibition was at the Gallery of Modern Art from 12 June until 17 October 2021 and organised by The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, in collaboration with the Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art and Art Exhibitions Australia. Featured image detail: Claude Monet Water Lilies 1916–19
  • Read

    Visual Storytelling: Designing for European Masterpieces

    Have you ever wondered what goes on behind-the-scenes when designing for a major exhibition ― specifically ‘European Masterpieces from The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York’ at the Gallery of Modern Art. Every exhibition starts with the artwork ― in this case 65 superb paintings spanning 500 years ― that offer a breath-taking journey from the 1420s and the emerging Renaissance to conclude at the height of early twentieth century post-impressionism in the 1920s. LIST OF WORKS: Discover all the artworks DELVE DEEPER: More about the artists and exhibition THE STUDIO: Artworks come to life WATCH: The Met Curators highlight their favourite works’ Visual storytelling Designing an exhibition at QAGOMA is a multidisciplinary process that combines staff from many departments with a variety of skills, such as curation, exhibition design, graphic design, web and motion graphics, workshop, registration and conservation teams, the installation crew, and finally lighting, all coming together where collaboration is the key to success. Visual storytelling underpins the display to create a meaningful and memorable experience for our audience. The challenge with ‘European Masterpieces’ was to display works over 500 years, moving smoothly through art movements from the fifteenth to twentieth centuries. The starting point for an overall design strategy was the GOMA building itself, enabling the design team to take a contemporary approach in contrast to the historic setting where the artworks are on permanent display in their home at The Metropolitan Museum of Art. The aim was to source and profile an architectural motif consistent over 500 years that could be applied both in an historical application yet with a modern twist. The arch offered such an opportunity to be adapted to accommodate the three distinct exhibition themes to create an unforgettable journey through the history of European art. Among a variety of design strategies to create an exhibition, exhibition designers combine a range of colour and intensity, a variety of materials and decoration, the construction of physical and visual pathways including transition zones, and ambient lighting to create just the right mood. The arch and its variations was accompanied with a carefully considered changing colour palette for each theme transitioning from dark to light and similarly with lighting tones. The arch ― in part inspired by The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s architecture, and historical prompts from the artworks themselves ― is repeated with subtle differences throughout the three chapter themes ‘Devotion and Renaissance’, ‘Absolutism and Enlightenment’, and finally ‘Revolution and Art for the People’. The arch: Variations of scale, form and detail The chapter themes have been used to divide the exhibition into three main curatorial groupings, and the arch, varying in scale and detail was a recurring design element throughout these different time periods ― Renaissance, Baroque and ending with the Modern. This connecting architectural element throughout these themes reduces in scale as you progress through time, playing with form to give prompts to the artistic period on display. Exhibition entrance Adopting the forced perspective techniques used in Renaissance architecture, a series of repeated arches decreasing in size and spacing, and a contemporary response to ‘candlelit’ alcoves, greet you at the exhibition entrance. An anteroom at the end of the corridor creates a moment to pause before entering the exhibition. Devotion and Renaissance Light levels start low and focused within ‘Devotion and Renaissance’ to become brighter as you navigate the exhibition. Combined with low height walls, colours of cool blue-grey and cool grey are complemented with warm ambient lighting. A light sandstone grey is used to accent the inside of the arch, a contrast against the cool walls. A single jack-chain curtain is the decorative feature overhead, with arched cut-outs it suspends to help create a solemn space for contemplation, reflecting the past grandeur of the church. To achieve the desired effect for the overhead highlight, both exhibition design and workshop went through an extensive testing and prototyping process, ruling out string, rope, plastic, and opting for a custom metal chain curtain pre-fabricated by the workshop team. Once the suspend arch feature was confirmed, arch openings were scaled and positioned to consider the placement of lighting tracks in relation to the position of artworks to ensure that the chain curtains wouldn’t cast shadows on artworks. Transition zone The transition zone between ‘Devotion and Renaissance’ and ‘Absolutism and Enlightenment’ of suspended pendant lighting, mirrors, checkered flooring, and archways placed within an elongated hallway sets the scene for what is to come next, allowing the visitor to pause before they encounter the next change of colour palette, an increase in the wall scale and a change to the arch form. Absolutism and Enlightenment Colour was introduced in ‘Absolutism and Enlightenment’ for dramatic appeal, creating a rich and vibrant luxury with the deeper wall hues, to give the second chapter a burst of drama through a bolder colour palette. Walls of crimson-red compliment the rich gold ornate frames and draws on the tones found in several of the artworks, a deep teal-green was used as an accent to contrast with the red and build on the exhibition palette. Revolution and Art for the People The last exhibition chapter theme ‘Revolution and Art for the People’ had a playful approach to the arch, interspersed in the meandering pathways. The light pastel palette layered on the walls as a base colour of soft grey, plus the spearmint and fresh light blue provided a foil for the bright bold matching tones inside of the arch of deep green and deep blue. The mix of pastel and bolder accents throughout the space created visual interest and movement, with the addition of pale and deep ochre as a contract against the cooler tones to complete the exhibition palette. These key exhibition design elements transition us from Renaissance altarpieces and chapels of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries when Christian traditions of devotion underscored one of the most...