This intriguing series of photographs by Yuki Kihara responds to the images of Samoa taken by Alfred Burton, who visited the Pacific in the 1880s, and looks to redress stereotypes of the Pacific perpetuated in colonial photography.

In the late nineteenth century, French artist Paul Gauguin borrowed stylistic traits from Italian Renaissance fresco painting to create the ambitious, nearly four-metre-long painting D’où venons nous / Que sommes nous / Où allons nous (Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?), dated 1897–98. The work was created in Tahiti as a visual manifesto on the nature of life, and arranged human, animal and symbolic figures across an idyllic island landscape. Inspired by a widespread fascination with the South Seas, the painting’s landscape and use of naked and partially clad figures mirrors the idea of Tahiti as an untouched Arcadian paradise that was popular at the time.

Just over a century later, Yuki Kihara employs photographic technologies (first developed in France in the mid nineteenth century) to create a narrative tableau exploring the complex interwoven histories that affect life in contemporary Samoa. Each of the photographs in this series features the artist in the guise of her alter ego, ‘Salome’ — a resurrected late-nineteenth-century widow in full mourning attire — viewing historically ‘altered’ landscapes of Samoa.

‘German Monument, Mulinu’u’ 2013

Yuki Kihara, Samoa b.1975 / German Monument, Mulinu’u (from ‘Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?’ series) 2013 / Type C photograph on Fuji Crystal Archive photographic paper mounted on aluminium Dibond / 79.5 x 104cm / Purchased 2015 with funds from Mary-Jeanne Hutchinson through the QAGOMA Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © Yuki Kihara

Yuki Kihara, Samoa b.1975 / German Monument, Mulinu’u (from ‘Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?’ series) 2013 / Type C photograph on Fuji Crystal Archive photographic paper mounted on aluminium Dibond / 79.5 x 104cm / Purchased 2015 with funds from Mary-Jeanne Hutchinson through the QAGOMA Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © Yuki Kihara / View full image

‘Mau Headquarters, Vaimoso’ 2013

Yuki Kihara, Samoa b.1975 / Mau Headquarters, Vaimoso (from ‘Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?’ series) 2013 / Type C photograph on Fuji Crystal Archive photographic paper mounted on aluminium Dibond / 79.5 x 104cm / Purchased 2015 with funds from Mary-Jeanne Hutchinson through the QAGOMA Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © Yuki Kihara

Yuki Kihara, Samoa b.1975 / Mau Headquarters, Vaimoso (from ‘Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?’ series) 2013 / Type C photograph on Fuji Crystal Archive photographic paper mounted on aluminium Dibond / 79.5 x 104cm / Purchased 2015 with funds from Mary-Jeanne Hutchinson through the QAGOMA Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © Yuki Kihara / View full image

‘Old Courthouse, Apia’ 2013

Yuki Kihara, Samoa b.1975 / Old Courthouse, Apia (from ‘Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?’ series) 2013 / Type C photograph on Fuji Crystal Archive photographic paper mounted on aluminium Dibond / 79.5 x 104cm / Purchased 2015 with funds from Mary-Jeanne Hutchinson through the QAGOMA Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © Yuki Kihara

Yuki Kihara, Samoa b.1975 / Old Courthouse, Apia (from ‘Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?’ series) 2013 / Type C photograph on Fuji Crystal Archive photographic paper mounted on aluminium Dibond / 79.5 x 104cm / Purchased 2015 with funds from Mary-Jeanne Hutchinson through the QAGOMA Foundation / Collection: Queensland Art Gallery | Gallery of Modern Art / © Yuki Kihara / View full image

Separated by over 100 years, Gauguin’s painting and Kihara’s photographs both situate islanders against a Pacific landscape. While Gauguin uses a Tahitian landscape as the exotic backdrop for his explorations of life, death, poetry and symbolic meaning, Kihara’s engagement shows a nuanced understanding of Pacific culture. Spooling cinematically across time as well as space, her photographic tableau sees Salome appear at iconic sites in a contemporary Samoan landscape, in the wake of Cyclone Evan and with the damage of Tsunami Galu Afi (in 2009) still evident. The huge physical impact of these natural disasters on well-preserved colonial architecture and institutions, historic landmarks, and more recently erected structures, such as the international airport, seems to highlight not only the historical and cultural occupation of this landscape, but also the cultural and economic challenges faced by an isolated island nation as it struggles to assert its independent presence on the world stage.

Yuki Kihara’s use of the photography to create her narrative tableau continues her long-held interest in redressing European stereotypes of the Pacific, perpetuated through colonial photographs of Samoa and its people. In addition to its Gauguin references, ‘Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?’ responds to the images of Samoa taken by Alfred Burton, who travelled on the Union Steam Ship Company’s inaugural cruise of the Pacific in the 1880s. The full-length mourning gown worn by Salome is inspired by the restrictive dress introduced to Samoa by early missionaries, which was worn by the female sitter in Thomas Andrew’s photograph Samoan Half Caste (from the album ‘Views in Pacific Islands’) 1886, in the collection of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington. While Andrew’s subject looks directly at the viewer, Kihara’s tightly corseted Salome turns away, instead casting her gaze over the landscape before her. Adopting the roles of director and producer, the artist provides Salome with a degree of agency unknown to her historical counterparts, with photographs that provide a postscript to earlier representations of these and questioning the stereotypes they asserted.

Related Stories

  • Read

    ‘Blood generation’ portraits show a deep connection to land

    The spectre of large mining trucks and overturned earth continues to loom over Bougainville as the elected government of the politically autonomous region looks towards a referendum on Independence, promised as part of the 2001 Bougainville Peace Agreement. The mine has been closed since 1989, and is currently protected by a Mining Act handing control of resources to landowners. Recently, a debate over whether the Mining Act should remain in place, or whether the mine will become a state resource, has resurfaced as Bougainville faces the referendum. The lucrative Panguna copper mine, the site of the bloody conflict that raged between 1988–2001 lies at the centre of debate: a landscape rich in mineral content and painful memories of loss and despair. For the six Indigenous territories connected to this site, this was once a landscape intimately tied to daily survival. It was the basis of socio-political economies based in matrilineal land systems, as well as a sacred place. At the time of the mine’s construction, the matrilineal owners of these customary lands squatted and chained themselves and their children to the trucks in protest. Two decades later, Sami resumes the pose, defiantly facing the jaws of a giant earth-moving truck. ‘Russel and the Panguna Mine’ 2009 ‘Jedi and the Mona’ 2009 ‘Veronica working the gardens, Buka’ 2011 ‘Mathew in the blue corner, Buka’ 2011 Taloi Havini and Stuart Miller’s photographs respond to the history and culture of Bougainville where Havini was born. As a descendant of the Hakö people, Havini’s ‘Blood generation’ portraits show the deep connection to land that her people have, despite the ravages of open-cut mining and over ten years of civil war (1988–2000). The portraits of Buka youth feature and are dedicated to a group of young people who were born during the bloody Bougainville conflict and who have since been named by their elders as the ‘blood generation’. The photographs are taken in the environments surrounding Bougainville, including the devastated landscape around the open-cut Panguna mine. Havini’s portraits assert strength and cultural resilience, and were created as talks resume around reopening the mine. Naming her subjects and rendering her portraits in crystalline detail, Havini draws attention to their individuality, their shared experiences of loss, and their intimate relationship to the landscape. Russel squats on the very top edge of the Panguna landscape once owned by six different indigenous groups, looking reflectively across its now empty, terraced expanse. Sami – like her forebears – stands in the same landscape, a small yet resistant presence beside an enormous mining truck. Veronica pauses from hoeing their families’ subsistence garden, the centre of her people’s kinship systems. Watch | Panel discussion exploring themes of politics & representation
  • Read

    The ‘Blood Generation’

    The photographic series ‘Blood Generation’ is born out of the people of Bougainville’s ongoing grief over the loss of their land as the result of mining interests. When Bougainville artist Taloi Havini talks about this history, she speaks passionately of the violent turning of earth to which they belonged, the earth that sustained her people for generations, and of the loss of soil containing graves — not only old graves, but the places where future generations were to be laid to rest. The large-scale photographs comprising the series appear as a landscape with all the sublimity of an expanded vista. They also contain incredible detail that pulls you into intimate textures: earth, skin, pores. The work is all about these two views, and crucially, what happens when they collide. Beginning with a group of portraits set in the devastated landscape of the contested Panguna mine in Bougainville, the series asks what happens to the surface of the earth and to the skin and pores of the bodies that inhabit it, when you step back and view it as a picture — are these merely things to be consumed? The term ‘Blood Generation’ is the name used in Bougainville to describe children born into the conflict that began in 1988 and raged for a decade between local landowners and the Papua New Guinean government, its business arm Bougainville Copper Limited (BCL) and the Australian owned mining company, Conzinc Rio-Tinto of Australia Limited (CRA), over the land of Panguna. Selecting this generation as the primary subject of their photographic series, artist Havini and photographer Stuart Miller seek to ‘flesh out’ the human cost, engaging with the impact on these young people of the destructive mining and loss of traditional lands. The images are portraits and are deliberately titled with the given names of their subjects: Russel (illustrated), Mathew (illustrated), Veronica (illustrated), Sami, Issac, Mark, Gori. The works are intimate, not only in the close-up, detailed views that they provide but also in the ways that they articulate these individuals’ relationship to where they are. ‘Russel and the Panguna Mine’ 2009 ‘Veronica working the gardens, Buka’ 2011 ‘Mathew in the blue corner, Buka’ 2011 In one, Russel is perched at the top edge of the Panguna landscape once occupied by six different indigenous groups, looking reflectively across its now empty, terraced expanse. In another, jean-clad Veronica pauses in the hoeing of the family garden, cultivated on customary land to provide their subsistence. Lastly, Mathew sits in the corner of an open-air boxing enclosure, empty and fenced with barbed wire, silently preparing for the next round. Created as talks resumed around reopening the open-cut Panguna Mine, the series is as much a political statement as it is an aesthetic one. The subjects of the photographs — Russel, Veronica and Mathew — are all a stark reminder that the site of the mine was and continues to be an inhabited landscape. They also assert a fiercely held sense of resistance and cultural autonomy. The people of Bougainville fought for a decade, with flesh and blood because the land isn’t a vista or a commodity but the place of their past and their future. In the words of Bougainville leader Raphael Bele: To Bougainvilleans, land is like the skin on the back of your hand. You inherit it, and it is your duty to pass it on to your children in as good condition as, or better than, that in which you received it. You would not expect us to sell our skin, would you?1 1 Raphael Bele, ‘The Bougainville land crisis’, 1969, p.29, in Moses and Rikha Havini, Bougainville: The Long Struggle for Freedom, New Age Publishers, Surry Hills, NSW, 1999, p.12.
Loading...