For Gerhard Richter, history, painting and photography are intimately linked, we therefore have listed five things that help understand one of the world’s leading and most influential living artists.

5 things to know about Gerhard Richter

1. History

Born in 1932, Gerhard Richter has been making art for as long as many of us have been alive. He was 12 years old when his city of birth, Dresden, was bombed by allied forces during World War Two. He and his mother were living in a rural town outside of Dresden at the time. When he returned to Dresden in 1951 to study at the Dresden Art Academy, more than five years after the end of the war, the city was still in ruins.

‘There were only piles of rubble to the left and right of what had been streets’. Every day we walked from the academy to the cafeteria through rubble, about two kilometres there and back’

Such events formed part of Richter’s early life and were to inform his art throughout his career. The two paintings, Uncle Rudi 1965 and Aunt Marianne 1965 are based on photographs from a family album that Richter took with him when he fled East Germany in 1961. They relate to his own family during the war years and their tragic history.

SIGN UP NOW: Be the first to know. Subscribe to QAGOMA Blog for the latest announcements, acquisitions, and behind-the-scenes features.

RELATED: Five reasons to be in awe of Gerhard Richter

RELATED: Gerhard Richter’s remarkable command of style and genre

DELVE DEEPER: Read more about Gerhard Richter

Gerhard Richter, 1950 / © Gerhard Richter 2017

Gerhard Richter, 1950 / © Gerhard Richter 2017 / View full image

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Aunt Marianne (87) 1965 / Oil on canvas / Collection: Yageo Foundation, Taiwan / © Gerhard Richter 2017

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Aunt Marianne (87) 1965 / Oil on canvas / Collection: Yageo Foundation, Taiwan / © Gerhard Richter 2017 / View full image

2. Freedom

Freedom can often require leaving something or someone behind. It comes at a price.

When Gerhard Richter left East Germany in March 1961 he had to do it covertly. He travelled as a tourist alone, first to Moscow and then to Leningrad. On the return the train stopped at West Berlin where Richter stashed additional suitcases he had brought with him, before returning to Dresden to collect his wife, Marianne Eufinger, known as ‘Ema’.

The borders between the Communist, German Democratic Republic and West Germany were being sealed — just months away from the erection of the Berlin Wall that was to divide the two Germanys for 28 years until its demolition in 1989. Trains and subways were still operating between the Soviet-occupied East and West Berlin making it the last remaining link to the free west.

Richter had a friend drive himself and Ema from Dresden to East Berlin where they boarded a train (without suitcases, which drew suspicion) for the western sector of Berlin where they registered as refugees. Between 1958 and 1961, 700,000 people fled East Germany for the West. Richter’s parents were never allowed to leave East Germany or to visit their son. They died in 1967 and 1968.

Richter was nearly thirty years old when he left East Germany. In Dusseldorf, where he studied and eventually taught, he began to number his works and reject almost everything he had done that was associated with his previous life. But your past never leaves you.

Richter has never been defined by a specific style and has used a variety of materials, techniques and methodologies during his career, like many young artists today. This represented a creative freedom for Richter who had spent more than a decade as a student and young apprentice in East Germany painting murals and making art within the narrow socialist confines of the German Democratic Republic. His academic training in Dresden did however, equip him with skills and technical facility that found expression later in still life paintings, portraits and landscapes.

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Seascape (377) 1975 / Oil on canvas / 200 x 300cm / Froehlich Collection, Stuttgart, Germany / © Gerhard Richter 2017

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Seascape (377) 1975 / Oil on canvas / 200 x 300cm / Froehlich Collection, Stuttgart, Germany / © Gerhard Richter 2017 / View full image

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Grey (397) 1976 / Oil on canvas / Accessions Committee Fund purchase: Gift of Gerson and Barbara Bakar Philanthropic Fund, Jean and James E Douglas, Jr, Evelyn D Haas, Doris and Donald Fisher, Mimi and Peter Haas, Phyllis and Stuart G Moldaw, Christine and Michael Murray, Leanne B Roberts, Helen and Charles Schwab, Danielle and Brooks Walker, Jr, and Judy and John Webb Collection: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, USA / © Gerhard Richter 2017

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Grey (397) 1976 / Oil on canvas / Accessions Committee Fund purchase: Gift of Gerson and Barbara Bakar Philanthropic Fund, Jean and James E Douglas, Jr, Evelyn D Haas, Doris and Donald Fisher, Mimi and Peter Haas, Phyllis and Stuart G Moldaw, Christine and Michael Murray, Leanne B Roberts, Helen and Charles Schwab, Danielle and Brooks Walker, Jr, and Judy and John Webb Collection: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, USA / © Gerhard Richter 2017 / View full image

3. Memory

The late writer, critic and essayist, John Berger once asked the question,

‘What served in place of the photograph; before the camera’s invention? The expected answer is the engraving, the drawing, the painting. The more revealing answer might be: memory’.

Photographs have been central to the art of Gerhard Richter. One of the few things he took with him to West Germany was a family album of photographs – some of which became the basis for later paintings. After arriving in West Germany, Richter began to systematically collect photographs, clippings from magazines and books and eventually took many thousands of his own photographs. This accumulation of photographic and reproduced images became the basis for his vast life-long project called Atlas.

Richter’s Atlas includes an extraordinary range of imagery, from harrowing images of the Holocaust to tender images of his children. It was created at a time before digital photography became so common place — when photographs were understood to be a trace of something or some time. Like footprints, fossils, markings on a tree — traces of what has been. Digital technology has changed photography from something we once looked at and reflected upon to something we Send. Once they were an index of memory, now we distribute them in their millions, and forget them.

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Atlas overview 1962-ongoing / © Gerhard Richter 2017 / Images courtesy: The artist and the Gerhard Richter Atelier

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Atlas overview 1962-ongoing / © Gerhard Richter 2017 / Images courtesy: The artist and the Gerhard Richter Atelier / View full image

Watch our time-lapse as we install the ATLAS compendium comprising some 400 panels personally selected by the artist from thousands of clippings, photographs and source images.

4. Beauty

Gerhard Richter has stated that beauty is a ‘dangerous word’. He was thinking about how the Third Reich associated beauty with the notion of racial purity — which culminated in obscene evil and violence. He has also said that, ‘beauty is the opposite of destruction, disintegration and damage’. Today ‘beauty’ is a loaded term. It is often considered obsolete in relation to art. In some instances it is understood to be ‘discriminatory’. But the word is still used, often and sometimes carelessly. Beauty can be found in a song, a thankyou note from a friend, a reflection on still water. Beauty can still be dangerous and it often keeps company with sadness.

Richter finds beauty in nature — an exquisite orchid, the light on the side of his wife’s hair. He has also described his monochrome grey paintings as possessing beauty. Perhaps beauty is not something we can ‘possess’ but only recognise.

Geraldine Kirrihi Barlow, Curatorial Manager, International Art, QAGOMA introduces you to her favourite work in ‘The Life of Images’.

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Reader (804) 1994 / Oil on canvas / Collection: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, USA. Purchase through the gifts of Mimi and Peter Haas and Helen and Charles Schwab, and the Accessions Committee Fund: Barbara and Gerson Bakar, Collectors Forum, Evelyn D. Haas, Elaine McKeon, Byron R. Meyer, Modern Art Council, Christine and Michael Murray, Nancy and Steven Oliver, Leanne B. Roberts, Madeleine H. Russell, Danielle and Brooks Walker, Jr., Phyllis C. Wattis, and Pat and Bill Wilson / © Gerhard Richter 2017

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Reader (804) 1994 / Oil on canvas / Collection: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, USA. Purchase through the gifts of Mimi and Peter Haas and Helen and Charles Schwab, and the Accessions Committee Fund: Barbara and Gerson Bakar, Collectors Forum, Evelyn D. Haas, Elaine McKeon, Byron R. Meyer, Modern Art Council, Christine and Michael Murray, Nancy and Steven Oliver, Leanne B. Roberts, Madeleine H. Russell, Danielle and Brooks Walker, Jr., Phyllis C. Wattis, and Pat and Bill Wilson / © Gerhard Richter 2017 / View full image

5. Reality

A common response by many thousands of people following the attacks on the World Trade Centre on September 11 2001 was incomprehension. The ‘reality’ of the situation was almost impossible to accept or understand. The event was immediately and constantly compared to a movie. The French theorist, Jean Baudrillard commented that the repeated broadcasts of the footage served ‘to multiply it to infinity and, at the same time, they are a diversion and a neutralization”—the more we see the events, the less comprehensible they become.’

Baudrillard was interested in the way that photographic media affect our perception of reality and the world. He believed that the overwhelming amount of imagery that we consume in the forms of television, film and video, computer games and the internet results in a ‘hyperreality’, a simulation of the real.

Gerhard Richter said that, ‘Photography has almost no reality; it is almost a hundred per cent picture. And painting always has reality: you can touch the paint; it has presence; but it always yields a picture – no matter whether good or bad. … I once took some small photographs and then smeared them with paint. That partly resolved the problem, and it’s really good – better than anything I could ever say on the subject’.

David Burnett is former Curator, International Art, QAGOMA

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / September (Ed. 139) 2009 / Print between glass / Lay Family Acquisition Fund Collection: Dallas Museum of Art, USA / © Gerhard Richter 2017

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / September (Ed. 139) 2009 / Print between glass / Lay Family Acquisition Fund Collection: Dallas Museum of Art, USA / © Gerhard Richter 2017 / View full image

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Two candles (499-4) 1982 / Oil on canvas / Leeum, Samsung Museum of Art, Seoul, South Korea / © Gerhard Richter 2017

Gerhard Richter, Germany b.1932 / Two candles (499-4) 1982 / Oil on canvas / Leeum, Samsung Museum of Art, Seoul, South Korea / © Gerhard Richter 2017 / View full image

Know Brisbane through the Collection / Read more about Australian art / Subscribe to QAGOMA YouTube to go behind-the-scenes

‘Gerhard Richter: The Life of Images‘ was at Brisbane’s Gallery of Modern Art (GOMA) from 14 October 2017 until 4 February 2018 and featured over 90 works from six decades of Richter’s career. Drawn from major museum and private collections, as well as Richter’s own personal archive, the exhibition provided a unique opportunity to view the diverse range of his exploration of painting.

See the world from a new perspective at QAGOMA. Together, the Queensland Art Gallery (QAG) and Gallery of Modern Art (GOMA) offer compelling experiences that will move and surprise you. Australia

Featured image detail: Gerhard Richter, 1970 © Gerhard Richter 2017

#GerhardRichter #QAGOMA

Related Stories

  • Read

    Through the social media lens

    The advent of social media is changing the way we visit galleries and how we perceive and experience art. While ‘selfie’ culture prompts extensive public debate, many cultural institutions now actively encourage visitors to engage with their organisation through digital platforms. Adam Suess unpacks his research into the use of Instagram in art galleries, especially at our recent Gerhard Richter exhibition. Gerhard Richter: Instagram in the art gallery In 1826, French inventor Joseph Nicéphore Niépce captured what is known to be the oldest surviving photograph taken with a camera. Nearly 200 years later, it is estimated that over 1.3 trillion photos will be taken in 2018 alone, with the growth attributed to the global rise in mobile smartphone ownership and social media use. Modern smartphones include highquality cameras, making amateur photography cheaper and easier than ever before. Many of us carry smartphones wherever we go, changing the story of personal photography from a practice once reserved for capturing iconic moments, such as birthdays and holidays, to something more ephemeral, spontaneous and mobile. Instagram has more than 800 million users and is arguably the world’s most popular social media platform dedicated to sharing digital images. A search for QAGOMA’s own hashtag #qagoma displays a wealth of visitor photography, especially from its most popular exhibitions. The Yayoi Kusama exhibition ‘Life is the Heart of a rainbow’ at GOMA during ‘Gerhard Richter: The Life of Images’ attracted thousands of visitor posts to its associated hashtag #KusamaGOMA. The use of Instagram in art galleries raises interesting questions about its effect on our experience of art, and whether it could be leveraged to deepen our engagement with the arts more broadly. The popular practice of taking selfies has polarised opinion in the debate on photography in museums and art galleries. Museum Selfie Day occurs on 17 January each year and celebrates museum selfie taking — the #museumselfie hashtag on Instagram holds more than 55 000 images. Many cultural institutions promote social photography to generate affinity with museums, yet some consider that it interrupts their visitors’ experience. The Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam has prohibited photography inside the exhibition space to avoid what they term a ‘nuisance’ to other visitors. The de Young Museum in San Francisco took a softer approach by introducing ‘photography free’ viewing times to meet the diverse expectations of visitors. However, recent research suggests that selfie sharing represents only a small component of Instagram use in cultural institutions; the Royal Ontario Museum in Canada analysed 263 693 social media visitor images, including those on Instagram, finding that selfies represented less than four per cent of the total visitor images. I conducted a study at GOMA coinciding with the ‘Gerhard Richter: The Life of Images’ exhibition. The study, part of a Griffith University PhD project examines visitors’ use of Instagram. I am intrigued by how people experience and respond to art, and I wanted to investigate what we could see and learn through the lens of Instagram that may not ordinarily be seen. Previous research at cultural institutions has shown that visitors used Instagram to re-curate exhibitions, extend dialogue outside the physical building, draw attention to exhibition objects, and link themselves to the exhibition. In my study, I observed 550 Instagram posts made by visitors to the Richter exhibition, using grounded theory for analysis. I interviewed a subset of 17 visitors to critically understand why they had posted part of their experience to Instagram. The results of my study showed three major findings: Visitors who used Instagram extended and evolved their aesthetic experience Instagram shaped the way visitors sawand used gallery spaces Sharing images on Instagram promoted their experience and built affinity with the exhibition, artist and Gallery. A number of scholars contend that the goal of an aesthetic experience is to know something, and to achieve this goal we construct an aesthetic experience through an evolving process. When faced with art, our mind seeks information in an effort to build knowledge. Like individual building blocks that together form a whole, our aesthetic experience evolves as we acquire information and physically experience our surroundings, fulfilling our goal of constructing knowledge. Participants in my study reported using Instagram as part of their visit to evolve their aesthetic experience through language, relationships, creativity, technology and place. Instagram also amplified aspects of their observation, making them more mindful of how they might represent their experience on Instagram, such as mimicking or copying Richter’s signature blurred style. Instagram also extended the aesthetic experience of some participants. An aesthetic experience extends when it stretches beyond the time and space of the physical visit, starting earlier and finishing later. Extension complements the concept of an evolving aesthetic experience, as it allows more time and space to build knowledge and engage in reflection. Since the exhibition was a ticketed event, many participants commented on how Instagram gave them an opportunity to glimpse other visitors’ experiences before deciding whether to attend the exhibition themselves. Participants also used Instagram to reflect on their visit afterwards during a period of contemplation when they decided which image to post. Instagram also influences how people move through the gallery space, and visitors often took close-up photos of the intricate detail of Richter’s tapestries or placed themselves between the photographer and the artwork. Richter’s Atlas overview 1962–ongoing highlighted this relationship; this section of the exhibition was an extensive 400-panel extract of the artist’s collected photographs, sketches, collages and cuttings displayed along a long corridor in the exhibition. Several visitor Instagram posts reflected the Atlas exhibit as a space rather than a composition of individual works — visitors represented themselves as being in the exhibition space, rather than looking at separate objects. Watch as we install Gerhard Richter’s Atlas overview 1962-ongoing The final major theme that this study found was the impact of visitors sharing on Instagram. Participants shared by viewing others’ images on Instagram, and shared their own for...
  • Read

    Gerhard Richter and Sonic Youth partner on Daydream Nation

    Gerhard Richter’s Two candles (499-4) 1982 belongs to a series of vanitas-inspired images that were a focus for Richter in the early 1980s. The vanitas tradition and the closely related concept of memento mori, at their height in the seventeenth century, used symbolic objects to remind the viewer of their mortality and the worthlessness of worldly goods and pleasures. Still-life painting was the vehicle by which this concept could be communicated visually. Motifs, such as skulls, the hourglass, rotting fruit and wilting flowers, were emblematic of the passage of time and the inevitability of death and decay. Similarly, the candle is a familiar vanitas motif, reminding the viewer of their mortality. The candle’s flame will burn for a finite time, then, as the wax melts away, the light will be extinguished. A similar painting Candle 1983 was used by American band Sonic Youth for the cover of their 1988 rock album Daydream Nation and references the name of one of their songs. Daydream Nation‘s title came from a lyric in the song ‘Hyperstation’, also considered was ‘Tonight’s the Day’ a lyric in ‘Candle’. The album is considered to be the band’s best work. Do you know of other recent album covers designed by artists? Delve into our Queensland Stories / Read about Australian Art / Subscribe to QAGOMA YouTube to go behind-the-scene ‘Gerhard Richter: The Life of Images‘ was at the Gallery of Modern Art (GOMA) from 14 October 2017 until 4 February 2018 and featured over 90 works from six decades of Richter’s career. Drawn from major museum and private collections, as well as Richter’s own personal archive, the exhibition provided a unique opportunity to view the diverse range of his exploration of painting. Featured image: Gerhard Richter’s Two candles (499-4) 1982 on view in ‘Gerhard Richter: The Life of Images’
Loading...