Cindy Sherman, United States b. 1954 / Untitled #475 2008 / Chromogenic colour print / 219.4 x 181.6cm / Courtesy: The artist and Metro Pictures

Cindy Sherman, United States b. 1954 / Untitled #475 2008 / Chromogenic colour print / 219.4 x 181.6cm / Courtesy: The artist and Metro Pictures / View full image

Cindy Sherman is counted among the most influential artists of the last 50 years. Sherman’s photographs are witty reflections on the representation of the aging female body and narcissism in contemporary pop culture. These themes are writ large in the ‘society portraits’ 2008 series, which pictures Sherman masquerading as a myriad of women claiming their stake as members of high society.

Cindy Sherman, United States b. 1954 / Untitled #474 2008 / Chromogenic colour print / 230.5 x 152.4cm / Courtesy: The artist and Metro Pictures

Cindy Sherman, United States b. 1954 / Untitled #474 2008 / Chromogenic colour print / 230.5 x 152.4cm / Courtesy: The artist and Metro Pictures / View full image

Each character is impeccably dressed in expensive clothes, staring judgmentally out of the frame and down at the viewer. The figure in Untitled #474 wears a sequined gown and attempts to preserve her youth with the aid of make-up and cosmetic surgery. She does not feel obligated to pander to the camera or seduce her audience with a smile.

This sense of superiority is mirrored by the woman depicted in Untitled #465, who, set against an opulent backdrop, leers dismissively over her shoulder at the viewer. Despite the poise, wealth and power possessed by each of the women in this series, there is an element of tragedy and loss that cannot be overlooked.

According to Sherman, the women depicted in the series ‘are trying to show the fruits of their efforts in life, but are not really comfortable with it’.1 Despite their inherited or more recently acquired wealth, the surgically-enhanced matriarchs and trophy wives are devoid of happiness.

Cindy Sherman Untitled, 2008 (MP# CS–465) page

Cindy Sherman Untitled, 2008 (MP# CS–465) page / View full image

As the title suggests each work in the series can be classified as a portrait. Portraiture is an art form that throughout history has been utilised by monarchs and elite members of the upper classes to represent their superior social standing and abundant wealth. While much of the writing on Sherman’s artworks is about how she analyses generic types, in this series Sherman has adopted a medium rooted in individuality and associated with privilege.


1 Sollins, Susan, “Cindy Sherman: It Began with Madame de Pompadour”, Art21, July 2013, http://www.art21.org/texts/cindy-sherman/interview-cindy-sherman-it-began-with-madame-de-pompadour (accessed February 2, 2016).

‘Cindy Sherman’ | Until 3 October 2016 | Ticketed
Buy Tickets
Buy the Publication
Further Information

Cindy Sherman Up Late | Ticketed
5.30pm – 10.00pm | Fridays 9, 16, 23, 30 September
Buy Tickets

Sundays with Cindy
28 August | 25 September

GOMA Talks Cindy Sherman | Free
6.30pm Thursday 21 and 28 July
Join us for discussions on contemporary feminism.

‘In Character’ Cinema Program | Until 28 August 2016 | Ticketed
Buy Tickets

Related Stories

  • Read

    Re/discover an inspirational icon

    Camille Serisier is a visual artist, her practice centres around her playful tableau of vibrant photographs, idea drawings, films and interactive installations. Through these ambitious and elaborate works Serisier uses the veil of playful absurdity to enact positive social change through storytelling. We asked Serisier to tell us how Cindy Sherman influenced her practice. I first became aware of Cindy Sherman’s work when I was at high school. Alongside amazing artists like Tracy Moffatt, she was one of few females amidst a sea of male makers taught out of art history books. Since that time many important female artists from the past have thankfully been ‘rediscovered’ and ‘rewritten’ into art history, but for me and perhaps my generation, Cindy Sherman was one of few female artists accepted, recorded and promoted during her lifetime. It was important to me to have works like Sherman’s to grow up with. I recently sat down with Paolo Magnanoli to discuss ways in which Sherman’s practice have influenced my own. Researching for the event I was reminded how much I have admired and referred to Sherman’s work over time. Right from the early film stills series to the present day society portraits her works have been a point of continual reference and reassurance. However, the engagement was not always conscious, sometimes just unavoidable. Her works are part of a powerful narrative within art history. They have become a prominent cultural reference, such that an image would pop up in a magazine or be cited in a text and I would have the opportunity to consider it in an easy, almost natural way. An all too rare circumstance. There are a number of lessons I have learnt from Sherman. Foremost is that art by women doesn’t just have to be for women. Although there is content that is concerned with the feminine, or feminism, Sherman’s work transcends these issues. Her practice offers a broader access point for discussions about popular culture, in particular film, that frame concerns about gendered representation in society at large. In some ways, particularly in her violent centrefold series, her works seem to target a male audience. I find this liberating. As a result, I have tried to speak to broader audiences in my work, even when that might seem unlikely given the subject matter. For example, I have been making a series about my experience of pregnancy (Venus of Brisbane, 2015-2016). Through these works I attempt to communicate with women who have been pregnant, as well as anyone who hasn’t, in order to initiate healthy discussions about female reproduction that have sometimes been shamed and silenced. The responses to these works have been intriguing. People of both genders have been repulsed by the premise of pregnancy as a subject for visual art. Many women that have experienced pregnancy voiced pleasure at being able to visualise a shared experience. Others have been outwardly curious about what they perceive as a taboo subject. That some people found my pregnancy works grotesque is particularly interesting when thinking about the influence of Sherman’s work. Sherman’s work is masterful, but not always ‘pretty’. Her work with prosthetics and clowns, for example, is grotesque and disturbing. I feel this opened up avenues for female artists not only to depict unattractive subject matter, but also to be unattractive subject matter. When I take photographs on my own, of myself, I am alone with the camera to explore the dimensions and potential of my representational and performative capacity. In my current series of works (Ladies of Oz, 2015-2016), I am making portraits of women from Australian history. I dress up and play out scenes from their lives amidst hand made scenery and props. The series explores ways in which women have contributed to Australian life, as well as the difficulties of representing women and history. I pose for the camera in ridiculous outfits and fake scenery, and generally embarrass myself for the sake of the narrative. Unlike Sherman ‘grotesque’ is not a word I have often encountered when people describe my work. I have traditionally used a pastel palette and doused my subjects in humour as a way of easing the viewer into sticky territory they may not otherwise be comfortable enough to address (The Wonderful Land of Oz, 2012-2016). When I make interactive gallery installations, I attempt to engage all ages and genders in playful theatrical sets that question gendered narrative assumptions, for example, that a pastel landscape could appeal to any gender entertain a male or that a female could be a ship’s captain (Swan Song #7, 2015). Play and humour have always been elements I have admired about Sherman’s work. Even images that deal with sexual violence against women contain absurdity or black humour that make consideration of the subject somehow more bearable. In this way artifice and illusion have been important tools for drawing out narrative for the viewer. I could ask for no better role model than Sherman, whose images often dance between believability and blatant deception. Sherman rifts off film, I analyse theatre in its various forms. Both mediums work with the basic premise that the viewer needs to accept the lie and get lost in the narrative. But like Sherman, I don’t want people to submit easily without asking whether the stories, the old black and white ones, the ones that repeat in various guises, wearing different attire, are the stories we agree with and want to perpetuate. It is important to have people to look up to. Sherman’s work is being shown at GOMA, making it is an excellent time to visit the gallery and re/discover an inspirational icon. Camille Serisier is a visual artist based in Brisbane, Australia. See her solo show Ladies of Oz at Spiro Grace Art Rooms during September 2016. Camille is represented by Spiro Grace Art Rooms. Want to know what else is on at QAGOMA? or Sign up to QAGOMA Enews
  • Read

    New York ‘socialites’ pose in Nicholas Ghesquière’s designs for Balenciaga

    Audiences currently have the rare opportunity to view a wide array of character studies constructed by renowned photographer Cindy Sherman. The exhibition focuses on Sherman’s photographs produced in the 21st Century, including a series made in collaboration with the fashion house Balenciaga. Sherman has received acclaim for her ability to bridge the gap between the fashion and art worlds in her photographic work. She has collaborated with a number of reputable fashion houses. In 1994, Sherman worked with Japanese fashion house Comme des Garҫons, resulting in an ad campaign featuring Sherman wearing Rei Kawakubo’s renowned designs within eerie, other-worldly settings. In 2006, Sherman was commissioned to work with fashion photographer Juergen Teller to create images for an advertising campaign for Marc Jacobs. The portraits for the campaign feature Sherman and Teller dressed in garments designed by Marc Jacobs, posing as a number of different ordinary social types, ranging from office workers to truckers.1 The bizarre and ‘ugly’ images that Sherman has created with different fashion houses and magazines contrast with the typically beautiful pictures that are normally projected by the fashion world. In 2007 Sherman was commissioned by French Vogue to create photographs featuring Nicholas Ghesquière’s designs for Balenciaga. These images where then reworked by the artist for the photographic series ‘Balenciaga’ 2007-08. New York socialites, all portrayed by Sherman, pose against digitally inserted blurry night club backgrounds. Despite the designer clothes and trendy setting, the images stand in opposition to the carefully styled shoots that you would typically encounter when reading a high-end fashion magazine. This can be attributed to the garish facial expressions of the characters which distract our focus from the clothes that they are wearing. These artworks resemble paparazzi shots, emphasising the narcissistic nature of the world these characters occupy. In Untitled #462, two fashionista’s wearing designer clothes and heavy makeup are pictured posing in a night club in Tribeca, SoHo or some other lively part of Manhattan. Despite the glitz and the glamour of the clothes and the setting, there is a comedic aspect to these works. The middle-aged women are desperately trying to look like they are in the prime of their life and having a good time. Much like the actors in Sherman’s ‘head shots’ 2000-02 series, the women in ‘Balenciaga’ desire the unattainable – to appear younger and cooler. They are relying on make-up, plastic surgery and youthful clothing to transport them back to their twenties. This is typified in Untitled #461, in which Sherman wearing a blond wig, a low cut shirt embellished with green frills, and a pout is set against a vibrant background of overlapping glaring coloured lights, reminiscent of a dance floor. Try as they might, the women in this series cannot escape the reality of middle age, which is has already encroached upon them. 1 Horyn, Cathy, “When Is a Fashion Ad Not a Fashion Ad?”, The New York Times, April 10, 2008, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/fashion/10TELLER.html?_r=0 (accessed April 14, 2016). ‘Cindy Sherman’ | Until 3 October 2016 | Ticketed Buy Tickets Buy the Publication Further Information Cindy Sherman Up Late | Ticketed 5.30pm – 10.00pm | Fridays 1 July; 9, 16, 23, 30 September Buy Tickets Sundays with Cindy 28 August | 25 September GOMA Talks Cindy Sherman | Free 6.30pm Thursday 21 and 28 July Join us for discussions on contemporary feminism. ‘In Character’ Cinema Program | Until 28 August 2016 | Ticketed Buy Tickets
Loading...